// Enterprises
Both sides of
the trust boundary.
Your organization may delegate authority to agents that act toward others — or receive actions from agents acting for someone else. Often both. The same transaction-bound evidence serves each side.
“We delegate authority to AI agents.”
You keep the original governance. MidPledge makes its current state verifiable to the parties your agents act toward.
- Governance & policy — stay in the sources you authorize
- Approvals & limits — scope, counterparties, thresholds
- Revocation — effective at the next verify
- Provenance — which source and version authorized it
MidPledge
resolve · check · bind
trust boundary
“We receive actions from external AI agents.”
Verify the exact action against current authority yourself — then choose whether to accept.
- Independent verify — your own call, before acceptance
- Scope & constraints — specific to this transaction
- Current state — active, revoked, unverifiable
- Your decision & shared evidence — accept, reject or request approval
MidPledge complements your IAM, policy, platform, risk and compliance systems. Trust & Architecture →
Illustrative workflows across sectors
- Software & cloud — an agent provisions resources with a partner within cost limits
- Data & analytics — an agent releases a dataset to another company for one purpose
- Financial services — an agent submits a bounded service instruction
- Retail & commerce — a merchant receives orders from customers' agents
- Operations — an agent instructs a logistics or service provider
- Multi-agent — a partner's agent acts under a narrowed, delegated scope
// What a pilot looks like
One real workflow, end to end
- 01
Scope
One consequential action that crosses your boundary — outbound or inbound.
- 02
Source
Which system holds the authority, and what the other side must verify.
- 03
Flow
Resolve, check, bind, verify, decide, record — fitted to your controls.
- 04
Validate
Realistic scenarios, including revocation, outage and out-of-scope requests.
Potential value is specific to each workflow; we don't claim measured results. Scope, timing and terms are agreed per engagement, and an inquiry doesn't guarantee pilot participation or commit either side.
Pilot story · one transaction
MP-TX-DEMO-3A90
- Principal
- Company A (issuer)
- Agent
- Agent-27
- Counterparty
- Organization B (relying party)
- Action · amount
- Cloud capacity order · USD 8,200
- Scope
- approved vendors · region EU · this order only
- Conditions
- human approval above USD 7,500 → requested, granted
- Current state
- active · source v12 · fresh at verify time
- Decision
- Organization B · ACCEPTED under its own credit policy
- Receipt
- Authority Receipt · evidence digest sha256:demo…a7d0
Illustrative Authority Receipt. Not a legal agreement.
Bring one consequential workflow
Tell us which side of the boundary you're on and the action you have in mind.
Discuss an enterprise use case or pilot